🎰 East Boston voters reject Suffolk Downs casino - allworldguns.ru

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 💰

Filter:
Sort:
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

BOSTON (AP) — A group of local anti-casino advocates is backing Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh as he calls into question the state's process.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The people of East Boston and Revere don't always take kindly to major corporations with big plans to transform the Suffolk Downs racetrack.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

So how much do you think this was about pure anti-casino sentiment versus discomfort knowing that East Boston residents had to vote not.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The people of East Boston and Revere don't always take kindly to major corporations with big plans to transform the Suffolk Downs racetrack.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Suffolk Downs, a famed but fading East Boston racetrack, is looking for a new Signs encouraging residents to vote for a casino at Suffolk Downs trade Suffolk needs their approval before it can compete against two potent.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Based on the results that are unofficial 56 % of East Boston voters arrived on the scene against the casino, with just 44 percent supporting it. That came as a.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

🤑

Software - MORE
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The people of East Boston and Revere don't always take kindly to major corporations with big plans to transform the Suffolk Downs racetrack.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

🤑

Software - MORE
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Suffolk Downs, a famed but fading East Boston racetrack, is looking for a new Signs encouraging residents to vote for a casino at Suffolk Downs trade Suffolk needs their approval before it can compete against two potent.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

🤑

Software - MORE
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

So how much do you think this was about pure anti-casino sentiment versus discomfort knowing that East Boston residents had to vote not.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

🤑

Software - MORE
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Based on the results that are unofficial 56 % of East Boston voters arrived on the scene against the casino, with just 44 percent supporting it. That came as a.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
anti casino east boston

I mean, you know, this was not an outcome that anybody was particularly expecting and we certainly had never considered the idea. What do these conflicting votes tell you about where sentiment is right now on casinos in Massachusetts? It's a possibility. It certainly was not part of the public discussion. Is it possible that we could get to the end of this process and have no approved casino projects, either because the developers didn't pass the background check or the host community rejected it? I think you probably got about 10 percent of the undecideds swung the other day because of the outcome with Caesars. The first thing it would mean is that the host community agreement which they negotiated, which gives them something-million dollars — that would be off the table because they would now become a surrounding community. Even at the time the legislation was passed, it was showing about 57 percent of Massachusetts residents supported casino gambling. The two remaining casino proposals in eastern Massachusetts are one in Milford, one in Everett. It's distributed in different places. We issue a license. All Things Considered Value this story? They might be able to extract some minor concessions in the surrounding community agreement, but it would be nothing approaching what they would get as a host community. It just wasn't what most people expected to happen. Does that surprise you that the commission hadn't explored this possibility already? They would get some property tax revenue from the part of the property that's on their side. I do know there are similar situations around the country involving Indian casinos where they take land into trust and they have a small parcel, and they will put the gaming facility on their land and then the non-gaming amenities on just regular property that they purchased. So it just hasn't been part of the public discussion until today. Springfield and Everett, on the other hand, have approved casino proposals. But there were strong pockets of anti-casino sentiment. But, from what I understand, this is not something they anticipated, so they would have to deliberate on this issue, as well. I don't know if it should have been. Is that a fair assessment? I suppose we could have anticipated it. Close close Donate. So they can get that issued fairly soon. The next step in the process here is to issue the slot parlor license. I mean, I think everyone really expected that Suffolk would win the East Boston election, even if it was by a very narrow margin. Sacha Pfeiffer: Is there anything in the state law that would prevent Suffolk Downs from pursuing this idea of locating a casino entirely in Revere? But, of course, when Suffolk Downs severed its relationship with its former casino partner, Caesars Entertainment, after Caesars failed the background check, that might have made a no vote even more likely. Skip to main content. Twitter facebook Email.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} So it's not unprecedented in similar situations. Yeah, I think it's feasible. So Suffolk Downs is now considering moving the whole project into Revere. She also reports for the station's various local news broadcasts. So if they're going to apply that same strict standard, yeah, we could get to the end of the road and have to start over all again. That they could have a casino right over the border but not get the benefits from it, the host agreement benefits? To my knowledge, no one anticipated that as a possibility. We would obviously entertain anything that they wanted to do. So they would start over — that's what would happen? This doesn't really fundamentally change their proposal. Listen Live: All Things Considered. All it would really involve is either moving the entire facility into Revere, or what's also been discussed is just flipping the project so that you have the casino gambling components of the facility on the Revere side of the property and you put more of your non-gaming amenities in East Boston, such as the hotel and restaurants and retail outlets. They'd open up the application process again? No, it doesn't. I think that definitely played into the election and it probably turned what would have been a close win into a decisive defeat. Let's take a listen to what he said:. They wouldn't just throw up their hands? It was a bad day in general for casinos in Massachusetts yesterday, as you know. Clyde Barrow: As I understand it, there's nothing in the state law that would prevent it. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}It's back to the drawing board for Suffolk Downs in the racetrack's quest to open a casino, now that East Boston overwhelmingly defeated the casino proposal Tuesday. Clyde, this kind of seems like a big mess. I think the expectation is that they would be issuing it before the end of this year. That would be a much less advantageous situation for East Boston. Not having done a poll, I would just have to guess. Voters in the western Massachusetts town of Palmer also rejected a casino proposal — the one from Mohegan Sun. Those background checks have not been done yet. So we'd have to look at a proposal. Or you could get an administrative ruling from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. But voters in neighboring Revere also got to vote on it because the proposed resort would extend into their city, and that community said yes. Surrounding communities are getting a lot less. My expectation is that probably about 45 percent of the voters in East Boston that turned out were pure anti-casino under any conditions. Given what happened with Caesars, it's certainly a possibility now with Wynn and MGM, because they both have issues with SEC investigations or issues in Macau that have been raised by other commissions such as New Jersey. And then it also has to do with mobilizing voters. Do you see that as a good scenario for East Boston if they got the hotel but not the casino? Close Close. We knew it was divided. Because all proposals have to be in to the gaming commission by the end of the year. So how much do you think this was about pure anti-casino sentiment versus discomfort knowing that East Boston residents had to vote not knowing who the casino partner would be? And how do we prevent it from going all the way there? That is a real possibility, and don't forget that MGM in Springfield hasn't been found suitable yet, either. The only obstacle might be a lawsuit from people in East Boston claiming it's a violation, which would require a judicial decision. Support the news. Is it your presumption that East Boston didn't consider that possibility? It wasn't really rural or urban. So even if legal, how about feasible given the time frame?